Re: [PATCHES] [PgFoundry] Unsigned Data Types [1 of 2]

2008-09-28 Thread Ryan Bradetich
Hello all, Just wanted to let everyone know I have committed this patch to the PgFoundry uint project. I have also updated the commit-fest wiki with this status. Thanks to everyone (especially Jaime) for the feedback and reviews. - Ryan -- Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@pos

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery

2008-09-28 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It does nothing AFAICS for the >> problem that when restarting archive recovery from a restartpoint, >> it's not clear when it is safe to start letting in backends. You need >> to get past the highest LSN that has made it out to disk, and there is >> no g

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery

2008-09-28 Thread Simon Riggs
On Sun, 2008-09-28 at 14:02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > It does nothing AFAICS for the > problem that when restarting archive recovery from a restartpoint, > it's not clear when it is safe to start letting in backends. You need > to get past the highest LSN that has made it out to disk, and there i

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] get_relation_stats_hook()

2008-09-28 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > New version of Postgres patch, v5. Implements suggested changes. > Ready for review and apply. Applied with some revisions. The method for passing back freefunc didn't work, so I made it pass the whole VariableStatsData struct instead; this might allow so

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] Infrastructure changes for recovery

2008-09-28 Thread Tom Lane
Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 18:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> After reading this for awhile, I realized that there is a rather >> fundamental problem with it: it switches into "consistent recovery" >> mode as soon as it's read WAL beyond ControlFile->minRecoveryPoi