Neil Conway wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > No problem. See the developers page for 5-minute build so you can check
> > your commit.
>
> I think it's best if people always check that they don't break the
> docs before committing changes. "make check" should be sufficient, and
> that is much f
Dennis Bjorklund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The doc for the trim functions does not say that the second argument can
> be omitted. This patch fixes it. It also fixes that the type text was not
> wrapped as text.
It would perhaps be clearer to show the single-argument forms as
separate entries
Bruce Momjian wrote:
No problem. See the developers page for 5-minute build so you can check
your commit.
I think it's best if people always check that they don't break the
docs before committing changes. "make check" should be sufficient, and
that is much faster than building the docs completel
Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
> The doc for the trim functions does not say that the second argument can
> be omitted. This patch fixes it. It also fixes that the type text was not
> wrapped as text.
Good.
> I can not build the docs myself, but i'm pretty sure it's correct.
No problem. See the deve
The doc for the trim functions does not say that the second argument can
be omitted. This patch fixes it. It also fixes that the type text was not
wrapped as text.
I can not build the docs myself, but i'm pretty sure it's correct.
Is it okay to commit this? Should I do it on the 7.4 branch also
