Michael Fuhr said:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:30:51PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
Global symbol $x requires explicit package name at (eval 3) line 1.
If I'm reading the Perl source code correctly (pp_ctl.c), the number
following eval comes from a variable named PL_evalseq that's
incremented
I wrote:
Michael Fuhr said:
we might be able to do
my $retval = eval($stuff);
$@ =~ s/ \(eval \d+\) / /g if $@;
return $retval;
T
It would probably be more efficient and less convoluted to munge this in a
__DIE__ handler. The we wouldn't need the extra level of eval.
e.g.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:50:06AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Here's an updated patch incorporating Michael's ideas, and this time
*with* a small regression test that dynamically turns strict mode on/off.
Shouldn't the $@ munging patterns include the /g flag so they remove
all occurrences of
Michael Fuhr wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:50:06AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Here's an updated patch incorporating Michael's ideas, and this time
*with* a small regression test that dynamically turns strict mode on/off.
Shouldn't the $@ munging patterns include the /g flag
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The attached patch allows the PL/Perl regression tests to pass when
use_strict is enabled. I've also attached a variant of plperl_elog.out
to account for an elog() message that shows a different line number
when run under use_strict.
Now that we've got
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 01:52:42PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
The attached patch allows the PL/Perl regression tests to pass when
use_strict is enabled. I've also attached a variant of plperl_elog.out
to account for an elog() message that shows a different line number
when run under
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's an updated version of the PL/Perl regression test patch that
works with Andrew Dunstan's strict mode patch, both when use_strict
is enabled and when it's disabled. The variant of plperl_elog.out
is no longer needed.
Actually, the main reason I
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 11:58:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's an updated version of the PL/Perl regression test patch that
works with Andrew Dunstan's strict mode patch, both when use_strict
is enabled and when it's disabled. The variant of
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:30:51PM -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
Global symbol $x requires explicit package name at (eval 3) line 1.
If I'm reading the Perl source code correctly (pp_ctl.c), the number
following eval comes from a variable named PL_evalseq that's
incremented each time it appears
The attached patch allows the PL/Perl regression tests to pass when
use_strict is enabled. I've also attached a variant of plperl_elog.out
to account for an elog() message that shows a different line number
when run under use_strict.
--
Michael Fuhr
Index: src/pl/plperl/sql/plperl.sql
10 matches
Mail list logo
