Qingqing Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In spirit of incremental improvement, here is a trivial fix to use %p
> instead %d to print pointer. -- maybe we should use context name better.
Actually, I wonder whether we shouldn't just get rid of these things
(CTX_printf/CTX1_printf) entirely; they
In spirit of incremental improvement, here is a trivial fix to use %p
instead %d to print pointer. -- maybe we should use context name better.
Regards,
Qingqing? printf_patch.diff
Index: nodeAppend.c
===
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/p
