Tom Lane wrote:
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A few comments on the module:
- can you include some licensing information? Distributed under the
same terms as PostgreSQL, Copyright ... should be sufficient unless
you'd prefer another license
Actually, it had better be same
Patch applied by Neil (thanks). Thanks.
---
John Gray wrote:
Hi,
I've done a bit of testing now and it seems that both sets of XML
functions will coexist in the same database (they both load OK and I can
use
Hi,
I've done a bit of testing now and it seems that both sets of XML
functions will coexist in the same database (they both load OK and I can
use functions from both without any apparent problem).
I have changed the name of the new parse function to xml_valid and fixed
a reference to SortMem
John Gray wrote:
I have changed the name of the new parse function to xml_valid and fixed
a reference to SortMem which meant that the code as supplied would work
against 7.3 and 7.4 but wouldn't work in CVS. Oops! Patch is attached.
Looks good -- I'll apply the patch by this evening.
-Neil
