Patch applied. Thanks. Your documentation changes can be viewed in
five minutes using links on the developer's page,
http://www.postgresql.org/developer/testing.
---
Joachim Wieland wrote:
> Is there any reason, why rege
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Seems there is some inconsistency there. There are two types of
> > function listings, one with just the types, and another with param_name
> > and then type. We use "string" instead of "text" because varchar() and
> > char() can also be used.
>
> Whe
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Seems there is some inconsistency there. There are two types of
> function listings, one with just the types, and another with param_name
> and then type. We use "string" instead of "text" because varchar() and
> char() can also be used.
Where did that come from? The ac
Joachim Wieland wrote:
> Is there any reason, why regexp_replace is not included in the tables of the
> string functions?
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/functions-string.html
>
> The appended patch adds regexp_replace() and links to the pattern matching
> section for substring
Is there any reason, why regexp_replace is not included in the tables of the
string functions?
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/functions-string.html
The appended patch adds regexp_replace() and links to the pattern matching
section for substring / regexp_replace.
I noticed that in
