Re: [PATCHES] snprintf improvements

Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is enabled, > > I see no point in this; it does not solve any problem we need solved, > only complicate the configuration behavior even more. Peter answered this. > > I added support for %qd and

Re: [PATCHES] snprintf improvements

Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is > > enabled, > > I see no point in this; it does not solve any problem we need solved, > only complicate the configuration behavior even more. I think this is analogous to checking for snprintf

Re: [PATCHES] snprintf improvements

Bruce Momjian writes: > This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is enabled, I see no point in this; it does not solve any problem we need solved, only complicate the configuration behavior even more. > I added support for %qd and %I64d in snprintf. I consider this an awful idea

Re: [PATCHES] snprintf improvements

Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 2. M?rz 2005 15:48 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > > This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is enabled, and > > I added support for %qd and %I64d in snprintf. We might need those in > > the final version if it is exported to apps. > > test -a is n

Re: [PATCHES] snprintf improvements

Am Mittwoch, 2. März 2005 15:48 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is enabled, and > I added support for %qd and %I64d in snprintf. We might need those in > the final version if it is exported to apps. test -a is not portable. -- Peter Eisentraut h

[PATCHES] snprintf improvements

This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is enabled, and I added support for %qd and %I64d in snprintf. We might need those in the final version if it is exported to apps. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us