Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I object to adding unnecessary complications like that.
Shouldn't BEGIN and START TRANSACTION have the same mechanics? The
changes to the code were the addition of only one line. The rest of
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jan Wieck wrote:
Since BEGIN isn't standard, wouldn't it be time to redirect them on the
BEGIN manpage to the START TRANSACTION manpage and tell them there that
BEGIN does not support the full syntax of START TRANSACTION?
Yea, we could do that, and
Bruce Momjian writes:
In fact, the BEGIN manual page says:
xref linkend=sql-start-transaction
endterm=sql-start-transaction-title has the same functionality
as commandBEGIN/.
which is currently not true because START TRANSACTION has additional
options.
Then the that manual page
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
In fact, the BEGIN manual page says:
xref linkend=sql-start-transaction
endterm=sql-start-transaction-title has the same functionality
as commandBEGIN/.
which is currently not true because START TRANSACTION has additional
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
I object to adding unnecessary complications like that.
Shouldn't BEGIN and START TRANSACTION have the same mechanics? The
changes to the code were the addition of only one line. The rest of the
patch was docs.
My initial
Gaetano Mendola wrote:
Hi all,
why START TRANSACTION READ ONLY is allowed
and not BEGIN READ ONLY ?
Seems it should be allowed so that BEGIN and START TRANSACTION behave
the same.
In fact, the BEGIN manual page says:
xref linkend=sql-start-transaction
