Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release

2005-01-22 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. ---

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release

2005-01-21 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Page Sent: 20 January 2005 15:29 To: Harald Massa; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Patches (PostgreSQL) Subject: Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release

2005-01-21 Thread Harald Massa
Dave, [access denied] I see that message if the service user cannot access the executable - in my case, when I tried running it from my development directory, which the service user has no access to. When I moved the file to C:\Program Files\PostgreSQL\8.0\bin, it worked perfectly. Hm.

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release

2005-01-20 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Harald Massa Sent: 20 January 2005 13:30 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release I am trying to install pg_autovacuum as a win32

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release

2005-01-20 Thread Dave Page
-Original Message- From: Harald Massa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 January 2005 16:07 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org Subject: RE: [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release Dave, thank you very much for fixing

Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] pg_autovacuum fails to start - 8.0 Release

2005-01-20 Thread Harald Massa
Dave, You probably need to restart after editting it so that the SCM reloads it. I am not quite sure if that really helped. Either way, I found a workaround and want to have it within googling space: at the moment the rest of the command-line after -E is stored within the DependOnService