Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:38:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > revision 1.23
> > date: 2008/03/05 19:42:11; author: alvherre; state: Exp; lines: +4 -4
> > Add support for dlopen on recent NetBSD/MIPS, per Rémi Zara.
>
> 19:42:11 I have one email going out to pgsql
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 07:38:21PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> >> I checked the Majordomo logs and there's nothing about those patches.
> >> I do see one message with the "Subject: pgsql: Clean up double negative,
> >> per Tom Lane." line. A
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> I checked the Majordomo logs and there's nothing about those patches.
>> I do see one message with the "Subject: pgsql: Clean up double negative,
>> per Tom Lane." line. A message held for moderation shows up in the logs
>> with a "stall" status.
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Both done -- I backpatched all the way down to 7.4 (and later I noticed
that the only 7.3 BF members are NetBSD).
Haven't we declared 7.3 at EOL anyway?
That's why I didn't backpatch it there. But if tha
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
Weird, I haven't seen the commit message come through here.
Yeah, that's strange -- the (2) commit message got to me, but this one
hasn't.
None of the back-patch
commits
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> Weird, I haven't seen the commit message come through here.
> >
> > > Yeah, that's strange -- the (2) commit message got to me, but this one
> > > hasn't.
> > None of the back-patch
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Both done -- I backpatched all the way down to 7.4 (and later I noticed
>> that the only 7.3 BF members are NetBSD).
>
> Haven't we declared 7.3 at EOL anyway?
That's why I didn't backpatch it there. But if that's the case, why are
we still rep
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Weird, I haven't seen the commit message come through here.
>
> > Yeah, that's strange -- the (2) commit message got to me, but this one
> > hasn't.
>
> Moderation filter got it for some reason?
Hmm, not modera
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Both done -- I backpatched all the way down to 7.4 (and later I noticed
that the only 7.3 BF members are NetBSD).
Haven't we declared 7.3 at EOL anyway?
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your s
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Weird, I haven't seen the commit message come through here.
> Yeah, that's strange -- the (2) commit message got to me, but this one
> hasn't.
Moderation filter got it for some reason? None of the back-patch
commits came through eit
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > R�mi Zara wrote:
> >> Recent version of NetBSD/MIPS support dlopen. This patch makes the
> >> netbsd dynloader tests availability of dlopen on HAVE_DLOPEN rather than
> >> on __mips__
>
> > Applied, thanks.
>
> Anyway: (1) this s
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Rémi Zara wrote:
>> Recent version of NetBSD/MIPS support dlopen. This patch makes the
>> netbsd dynloader tests availability of dlopen on HAVE_DLOPEN rather than
>> on __mips__
> Applied, thanks.
Weird, I haven't seen the commit message come throug
Rémi Zara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recent version of NetBSD/MIPS support dlopen. This patch makes the
> netbsd dynloader tests availability of dlopen on HAVE_DLOPEN rather than
> on __mips__
Applied, thanks.
--
Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Rep
13 matches
Mail list logo
