Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Both done -- I backpatched all the way down to 7.4 (and later I noticed
that the only 7.3 BF members are NetBSD).
Haven't we declared 7.3 at EOL anyway?

That's why I didn't backpatch it there.  But if that's the case, why are
we still reporting 7.3 in the buildfarm status page?

Because until a couple of weeks ago those two machines were still reporting that branch. When they are 30 days old the reports will drop off the page. (It looks like salamander has stopped altogether, which Tom mentioned the other day would distress him some.)



Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to