Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch to remove .so pattern rules from platform Makefiles

2005-07-26 Thread Rocco Altier
> -Original Message- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Rocco Altier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Please disregard this patch. I have a ton of lib%.exp and > > similar files created currently. > > Yeah, that was one of the reasons I called it ugly :-(. I > had put in

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch to remove .so pattern rules from platform Makefiles

2005-07-26 Thread Tom Lane
"Rocco Altier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please disregard this patch. I have a ton of lib%.exp and similar files > created currently. Yeah, that was one of the reasons I called it ugly :-(. I had put in an "rm" step to get rid of lib%.so, you could probably fix the extraneous .exp files simi

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch to remove .so pattern rules from platform Makefiles

2005-07-26 Thread Rocco Altier
Of Rocco Altier > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 1:17 PM > To: Tom Lane; pgsql-patches@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch to remove .so pattern > rules from platform Makefiles > > > The patch works on AIX with one small tweak to Makefile.shlib > (attached

Re: [PATCHES] Proposed patch to remove .so pattern rules from platform Makefiles

2005-07-25 Thread Rocco Altier
The patch works on AIX with one small tweak to Makefile.shlib (attached). This is needed because of the clever trick with using % as name, and when its evaulated for the mkldexport. Also, it appears that the changes for regress/GNUmakefile are already applied. I am able to build everything and p