Re: [PATCHES] Support LDFLAGS_SL on most ports

2004-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have applied your newest version of this patch, which I have attached. I also added code for Win32 and Cygwin. Thanks. --- Oliver Jowett wrote: > This patch includes LDFLAGS_SL in SHLIB_LINK on most ports (previously > i

Re: [PATCHES] Support LDFLAGS_SL on most ports

2004-10-07 Thread Oliver Jowett
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Two comments: First, support for specifying it on configure requires you to call AC_ARG_VAR ("require" as in it would prevent people from shooting themselves in the foot). Please read up on it and add the appropriate call. Ok, so that makes sure that the var is hooked in

Re: [PATCHES] Support LDFLAGS_SL on most ports

2004-10-07 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Oliver Jowett wrote: > This patch includes LDFLAGS_SL in SHLIB_LINK on most ports > (previously it was only used on AIX and BeOS), and adds support for > specifying it in configure. > > This lets you do something like: > >./configure LDFLAGS=-static-libgcc LDFLAGS_SL=-static-libgcc > > to produ

Re: [PATCHES] Support LDFLAGS_SL on most ports

2004-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oliver Jowett wrote: >> Any feedback on this patch? Can it get applied for 8.0? > I haven't reviewed it yet. It looked alright to me, but probably Peter should have the last word. regards, tom lane ---(e

Re: [PATCHES] Support LDFLAGS_SL on most ports

2004-10-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
I haven't reviewed it yet. --- Oliver Jowett wrote: > Oliver Jowett wrote: > > This patch includes LDFLAGS_SL in SHLIB_LINK on most ports (previously > > it was only used on AIX and BeOS), and adds support for specifying it

Re: [PATCHES] Support LDFLAGS_SL on most ports

2004-10-05 Thread Oliver Jowett
Oliver Jowett wrote: This patch includes LDFLAGS_SL in SHLIB_LINK on most ports (previously it was only used on AIX and BeOS), and adds support for specifying it in configure. Any feedback on this patch? Can it get applied for 8.0? -O ---(end of broadcast)-