Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Version patch

2004-10-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. I made the wording correction suggested by Dave Page. Cleaned up patch attached. I think the impact is minimal as I renamed some things and moved the binary description up to the top of the Makefile so it looks like a comment. ---

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Version patch

2004-09-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. If only psql uses the ico file right now, let's leave it in psql directory. We

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Version patch

2004-09-02 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: Magnus Hagander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 02 September 2004 09:47 > To: Bruce Momjian; Dave Page > Cc: PostgreSQL-patches > Subject: RE: [PATCHES] Win32 Version patch > > But I can send > the same patch again.

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Version patch

2004-09-02 Thread Magnus Hagander
> Dave Page wrote: > > Evening committers, > > > > Any ideas when Magnus' win32 version numbering patch is > likely to get > > applied? > > Good question. Last I saw it it was quite large. Magnus, > would you post a new version so we can look it over again. I > have no problem with the bin

Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Version patch

2004-09-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Dave Page wrote: > Evening committers, > > Any ideas when Magnus' win32 version numbering patch is likely to get > applied? Good question. Last I saw it it was quite large. Magnus, would you post a new version so we can look it over again. I have no problem with the binary file you suggested.