On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 00:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> isViewOnTempTable_walker. If that isn't euphonious to you, then change
> the name of isViewOnTempTable. Everywhere else that we have walker
> subroutines, foo() invokes foo_walker(). You need a seriously good reason
> to deviate from that conv
On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 00:39 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Maybe I'm reading the wrong thing, but the only uses of CASCADED-with-
> a-D that I see in the spec are in the context of WITH CHECK OPTION,
> which this patch does not implement.
Precisely; prior to the patch, WITH CHECK OPTION was documented i
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 01:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> The references to "CASCADED" (sic) in the patch are surely bogus.
> Per SQL:2003 section 11.22, it is spelt "CASCADED".
Maybe I'm reading the wrong thing, but the only uses of CASCADED-with-
a-D that I
On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 01:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> The references to "CASCADED" (sic) in the patch are surely bogus.
Per SQL:2003 section 11.22, it is spelt "CASCADED". I'm not sure there's
a whole lot of value in documenting syntax we don't support, but if
we're going to do it we may as well ge
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 09:39 +1000, Koju Iijima wrote:
>> I have implemented temporary view related items as I proposed few days ago.
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00682.php
> Barring any objections, I'll apply this patch tomorr
On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 09:39 +1000, Koju Iijima wrote:
> I have implemented temporary view related items as I proposed few days ago.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-09/msg00682.php
Barring any objections, I'll apply this patch tomorrow.
-Neil
---(end
This has been saved for the 8.1 release:
http:/momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2
---
Koju Iijima wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I have implemented temporary view related items as I proposed few days ago.
> ht
