Re: [PATCHES] psql prompts with invisible characters

2004-05-28 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: Uh, wasn't this applied some time ago? regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and

Re: [PATCHES] psql prompts with invisible characters

2004-02-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches I will try to apply it within the next 48 hours. --- Reece Hart wrote: Okay, Tom, here's

Re: [PATCHES] psql prompts with invisible characters

2004-02-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: Uh, wasn't this applied some time ago? Yes, I see it now. I am not sure why I missed the commit message. It might have been during those few days where I had email

Re: [PATCHES] psql prompts with invisible characters, take III

2004-01-20 Thread Reece Hart
Tom- Here's take III of the patch, with the #ifdef for RL_PROMPT_START_IGNORE, the #else chopped, and made with diff -c against 7.4.1. A brief comment seemed warranted since this is an undocumented readline feature. Note that the #if is: #if defined (USE_READLINE) defined

Re: [PATCHES] psql prompts with invisible characters

2004-01-19 Thread Reece Hart
On Fri, 2004-01-16 at 13:34, Tom Lane wrote: how far back do they have support for these RL_PROMPT_foo symbols, and do we need to consider the possibility that the symbols aren't there or act differently? Short answer: I believe that any readline newer than Feb 1999 oughta work. The