Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The procedure I'm following is:
>
> > - for trivial / obviously correct patches, just apply them immediately
>
> Check.
>
> > - for fairly simple patches, submit them to the list and apply them
> > fairly soon afterward (say, within
Neil Conway wrote:
> P.S. BTW, how does everyone feel about the methodology I've been
> using for submitting and applying patches? The procedure I'm
> following is:
>
> - for trivial / obviously correct patches, just apply them
> immediately
>
> - for fairly simple patches, submit them to the list
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The procedure I'm following is:
> - for trivial / obviously correct patches, just apply them immediately
Check.
> - for fairly simple patches, submit them to the list and apply them
> fairly soon afterward (say, within 24 hours or 48 hours). When I
>
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unless anyone objects, I intend to apply this in 24 hours or so.
Patch applied.
-Neil
P.S. BTW, how does everyone feel about the methodology I've been using
for submitting and applying patches? The procedure I'm following is:
- for trivial / obviously c
