Am Mittwoch, 12. Mai 2004 04:07 schrieb Mahesh Swamy:
> 2/ If there is no convention is it ok to use the letter 'x' for all our
> State codes? eg. if we want to add a state under the "53" class, we would
> use "53x001", "53x002" and so on.
That doesn't work, because sqlstate values have to be exac
Am Montag, 10. Mai 2004 09:17 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> It appears that Dann Corbit has filed a MinGW bug on this, with accurate
> problem description, but he received a less than stellar response. See
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?
> func=detail&aid=931263&group_id=2435&atid=102435
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Montag, 10. Mai 2004 09:17 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
>> It appears that Dann Corbit has filed a MinGW bug on this, with accurate
>> problem description, but he received a less than stellar response. See
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Thomas Hallgren wrote:
> Here's a patch that will allow external modules like pl to set
> additional flags for the dlltool and dllwrap commands. More info here:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.or
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 00:55, Mahesh Swamy wrote:
> I think that I have missed explaining a point. We are developing a
> proprietary extension to PostgreSQL. This means that some errors that are
> thrown in our extension will never be thrown by the OSS community code.
> Thus, for these cases we shou
Adjusted attached patch applied. Thanks.
I didn't change 'test -e' because 'test -h' doesn't work (is symlink
test on my platform). test -f actually works on symlinks too in MinGW,
strangely enough. Anyway, the code is only run on MinGW so we don't
have to worry about other platforms. I added
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Am Montag, 10. Mai 2004 09:17 schrieb Andrew Dunstan:
> >> It appears that Dann Corbit has filed a MinGW bug on this, with accurate
> >> problem description, but he received a less than stellar response. See
> >>
> >> https://sourc
Hi All,
Just a quick question about code changes to
7.4.1. I hope this the right mailing list. If it is not, please point me in the
right direction... I am new to these lists.
We have noticed that a function from 7.3.3:
SetDataBaseName(const char *name) (in file miscinit.c), and the
char
This patch incorporates a number of changes suggested by the group. The
purpose of this patch is to move postgresql to a position where all
configuration options are specified in one place. The postgresql.conf file
could completely document a postgresql environment.
It adds this functionality:
T
Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Comments welcome. Reviewers: I am not sure I got multi-byte stuff right
> in psql/mainloop.c - please pay close attention to that.
The i-1 stuff should generally be i-prevlen. Not sure if there are any
other pitfalls.
A bigger problem here:
> +
10 matches
Mail list logo
