Stephan Szabo wrote:
> I believe overlap of functions in the same expression was disallowed by
> the response to defect report 087. The only reference I've been able to
> find right now (since the committee seems to have removed the C89 DRs from
> their site) is in the response to DR 287 which in
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 11:58:14PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Patch applied. Thanks.
Great!
Small problem with the 3 patches: you forgot to 'cvs add' new files?
--
marko
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Marko Kreen wrote:
> As Kris Jurka found out, pgcrypto does not work with
> OpenSSL 0.9.6x. The DES functions use the older 'des_'
> API, but the newer 3DES functions use the 0.9.7x-only
> 'DES_
Where are we on this patch? Is there something to apply?
---
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Neil Conway wrote:
>
> > Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > > ok, but don't forget, please, on exception part.
> >
> > What do
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Where are we on this patch? Is there something to apply?
Not at the moment. I believe we have agreed that it would be better to
remove the concept of "exception variables" and just use strings, but I
haven't implemented this yet. I'm happy to do that, but I might not get
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> The attached patch implements spi_query() and spi_fetchrow() functions
> for PL/Perl, to avoid loading the entire result set into memory as the
> existing spi_exec_quer
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Following up a previous thought I had, yesterday I realised how to
> return arays nicely without having to make the plperl programmer aware
> of anything. The attache
Add pg_dump --encoding.
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > > I *think* that's easy enough to do in time for 8.1. Trivial patch
> > > attached. I hope it's enough :-) It passed my very quick testing...
The change below has broken tsearch2. See for example
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=shrew&dt=2005-07-10%2015:02:01
cheers
andrew
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I have applied your patch, with slight adjustments in spacing and
documentation.
Patch applied. Thanks.
[snip]
Hi guys,
BTW, I found the work_mem is still limited to 2GB.
If we support 64bit shared memory, we also need to support
64bit work_mem.
Thanks.
--
NAGAYASU Satoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensi
10 matches
Mail list logo