[PATCHES] TODO item - tid <> operator

Please find enclosed a patch that adds a '<>' operator for tid types (per TODO item). Patch is against current sources (beta4). If I have understood the requirement properly, the relevant function 'tidne' already existed in src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c, just needed an ifdef NOT_USED removed. Th

Re: [PATCHES] TODO item - tid <> operator

On Mon, 2005-24-10 at 20:09 +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote: > *** src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c 27 May 2005 00:57:49 - 1.49 > --- src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c 24 Oct 2005 02:34:51 - > *** > *** 174,180 > arg1->ip_posid == arg2->ip_

Re: [PATCHES] Another small pl/perl patch

Well, I personally almost always use indirect file handles rather than globals. But I don't know that using globals file handles (which is what I gather you are objecting to) is deprecated, is it? The perl docs are absolutely littered with examples. (I also use BSD style intentation consiste

Re: [PATCHES] Another small pl/perl patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Well, I personally almost always use indirect file handles rather than > globals. But I don't know that using globals file handles (which is what > I gather you are objecting to) is deprecated, is it? The perl docs are > absolutely littered with ex

Re: [PATCHES] Another small pl/perl patch

Greg Sabino Mullane wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Well, I personally almost always use indirect file handles rather than globals. But I don't know that using globals file handles (which is what I gather you are objecting to) is deprecated, is it? The perl docs are

Re: [PATCHES] [DOCS] Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?

Tom Lane wrote: > Volkan YAZICI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Revision 1.269: Wed Mar 24 03:44:59 2004 UTC by momjian > > Branches: MAIN > > ] Add thread locking to SSL and Kerberos connections. > > ] > > ] I have removed the docs mentioning that SSL and Kerberos are not > > ] thread-safe. > > ]

Re: [PATCHES] [PATCH] Symbol restriction and versioning

This has been saved for the 8.2 release: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold --- Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: -- Start of PGP signed section. > [Please CC any replies, thanks] > > NOTE: I am not r

Re: [DOCS] [PATCHES] Caveat for Domains

David Fetter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:57:35PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > Patch applied. Thanks. > > Could you please put fixing domains for functions on the TODO list? Added to TODO: * Allow user-defined functions retuning a domain value to enforce domain constraints

Re: [PATCHES] TODO item - tid <> operator

Neil Conway wrote: You also probably want to add the declaration for tidne() to include/utils/builtins.h Doh! - Indeed, I obviously missed a few extra compile warnings! Revised patch attached. Index: src/backend/utils/adt/tid.c ===

Re: [PATCHES] AIX FAQ update for 5.3 socket address size issue

Patch applied. Thanks. --- Chris Browne wrote: > IBM has addressed the socket address storage issue as of AIX 5.3 > maintenance level 5300-03; the following patch adds documentation to > FAQ_AIX... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:O

[PATCHES] Release notes typo

"dates who's result" should be "dates whose result." -- Michael Fuhr Index: doc/src/sgml/release.sgml === RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/release.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.391 diff -c -r1.391 release.sgml *** doc/sr

Re: [PATCHES] Release notes typo

Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "dates who's result" should be "dates whose result." It's still horrible English :-( A date hasn't got a result, much less one that includes a daylight savings time adjustment period. We should rewrite the entire paragraph. Maybe Days that cont

Re: [PATCHES] Release notes typo

On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:17:52AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > "dates who's result" should be "dates whose result." > > It's still horrible English :-( A date hasn't got a result, much > less one that includes a daylight savings time adjustment period. G