Bruce Momjian wrote:
In any case please be consistent about the capitalization ...
OK, updated text:
--with-openssl build with OpenSSL support
--with-libedit-preferred prefer Libedit over Libreadline
--without-readline do not use Libreadline/Libedit line editing
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
In any case please be consistent about the capitalization ...
OK, updated text:
--with-openssl build with OpenSSL support
--with-libedit-preferred prefer Libedit over Libreadline
--without-readline do not use
Bruce Momjian wrote:
They are called Readline and Libedit.
I wanted to distinguish libreadline from readline-functionality.
The functionality may be called command-line editing but I don't see
how that relates to what actually appears in the patch.
Why is it Readline?
PostgreSQL was
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
They are called Readline and Libedit.
I wanted to distinguish libreadline from readline-functionality.
The functionality may be called command-line editing but I don't see
how that relates to what actually appears in the patch.
When you
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I wanted to distinguish libreadline from readline-functionality. Why is
it Readline?
The GNU Readline Library is usually referred to as Readline, not
libreadline. The offical name for libedit is really Libedit.
See e.g.:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/libedit/
Michael Paesold wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I wanted to distinguish libreadline from readline-functionality. Why is
it Readline?
The GNU Readline Library is usually referred to as Readline, not
libreadline. The offical name for libedit is really Libedit.
See e.g.:
Nicolai Tufar wrote:
Greetings,
Last April we have made some changes to src/ports/snprintf.c so that it
would support argument reordering like %2$s, %1$d and such on
platforms where original snprintf() does not support it, like Windows,
HP-UX or NetBSD.
Sure, I remember. So glad you
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
I am also thinking of modifying the code so if we are using snprintf.c
only because we need positional parameter control, we check for '$' in
the string and only use snprintf.c in those cases.
What's the point? If the code is in there we may as
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
I am also thinking of modifying the code so if we are using snprintf.c
only because we need positional parameter control, we check for '$' in
the string and only use snprintf.c in those cases.
What's the point? If the code is
Here is the commit:
revision 1.409
date: 2005/05/05 19:15:54; author: momjian; state:
Exp; lines: +8 -2
On Win32, libintl replaces snprintf() with its own version that
understands arg control, so we don't need our own. In fact, it
also uses macros
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
(I could have done the struct but that seemed too invasive.)
I think it'd be a lot cleaner with the struct. Mind if I take another
pass at it?
regards, tom lane
---(end of
Greetings,
I thought it will be as simple as changing Makefile, the issue seem to be
much more complicated. Unfortunately I have no PostgreSQL building
environment handy and will not be able to look at it until the end of next
week because I am moving my house :( But since this issue waited for
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
(I could have done the struct but that seemed too invasive.)
I think it'd be a lot cleaner with the struct. Mind if I take another
pass at it?
OK, you want my patch or want me to apply and then you can modify?
--
Bruce
I have commited your fixes into PostgreSQL 8.1 stable branches.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
Hi Tatsuo,
Attached is a proposed patch that deals with a couple of pgbench issues.
The change at line 490 updates doCustom's local variable commands
after selecting a new file (command
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I think it'd be a lot cleaner with the struct. Mind if I take another
pass at it?
OK, you want my patch or want me to apply and then you can modify?
You sent out your patch already --- I've been working from that.
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I think it'd be a lot cleaner with the struct. Mind if I take another
pass at it?
OK, you want my patch or want me to apply and then you can modify?
You sent out your patch already --- I've been working
Patch applied.
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Michael Paesold wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
I wanted to distinguish libreadline from readline-functionality. Why is
it Readline?
The GNU Readline Library is usually
Where are we on this patch? I don't see it as applied to CVS.
---
Pavel Stehule wrote:
- we can't use estate-rsi for the RETURN case, at least as presently
implemented, because that is not always filled-out -- the
18 matches
Mail list logo
