On Sunday 06 July 2003 20:55, Tom Lane wrote:
> Shridhar Daithankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In addition to Tom's patch, this patch asks tuning parameters right away,
> > while doing initdb.
>
> Sorry, there is zero chance of putting any interactivity into initdb.
> Most RPM installations ru
Bruno Wolff III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Should the default max number of connections first try something greater
> than what Apache sets by default (256 for prefork, 400 for worker)?
We could do that. I'm a little worried about setting default values
that are likely to cause problems with e
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 15:29:37 -0400,
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 3. What should be the set of tested values? I have it as
>buffers: first to work of 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 50
>connections: first to work of 100 50 40 30 20 10
> but we could certainly argu
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I inquired about this problem elsewhere, it's not a bug, it's an API change.
> > Until postgres "ports" to the new API it won't work with newer versions of
> > Flex.
>
> If their intent was to break things, why wa
Shridhar Daithankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In addition to Tom's patch, this patch asks tuning parameters right away,
> while doing initdb.
Sorry, there is zero chance of putting any interactivity into initdb.
Most RPM installations run it from the RPM install script and would be
unable to
Hi all,
In addition to Tom's patch, this patch asks tuning parameters right away,
while doing initdb. I have also changed the notice displayed after initdb is
done.
Just an attempt to make defaults user friendly. I would also like to add other
paramters to this approach, like fsync and random_
Is there a problem about the archive?
I posted this addition to the patch on July 2, and received it over the
patches mailing list. Still, it doesn't appear in cvs, in "unapplied
patches" or in the mailing list archive! So although that message made
its way through the list server, it didn't end