Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Magnus Hagander wrote:
Per discussion earlier today, here is a fix that lets ereport() on win32
report socket errors.
//Magnus
win32_socketerror.patch
Content-Description:
This patch makes psql's \d+ command indicate whether the table in
question contains OIDs or not. I didn't add this information to \d, on
the grounds that \d is more commonly used and few people will care
whether the table as OIDs. Example output:
nconway=# create table t1 () with oids;
CREATE
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
Kris Jurka wrote:
This patch makes the EXECUTE command's completion tag return the
completion tag of the actual statement executed.
While I don't have any
Patch applied. Thanks.
Should this be backpatched to 7.4.X? The patch didn't apply cleanly to
that CVS branch.
---
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached is are a few small fixes for dbmirror.
1. Fixed bug where
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch changes PrivateRefCount and LocalRefCount in the bufmgr from
being arrays of long to arrays of int32, per earlier discussion.
I just committed a bunch of changes in bufmgr --- hope I didn't tramp on
your toes too much.
*** 176,184
On Wed, 2004-04-21 at 23:20, Tom Lane wrote:
I just committed a bunch of changes in bufmgr --- hope I didn't tramp on
your toes too much.
No problem, it didn't take too long to rediff. Besides, it was negligent
of me not to get that work committed sooner. (BTW, I'm finished exams
now, and I
Patch applied. Thanks.
I have 3 others somehow minor patches that are being submitted:
(1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions
(2) Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 19:35:57 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [PATCHES] 'information_schema' considered a
Am Donnerstag, 22. April 2004 08:44 schrieb Neil Conway:
nconway=# \d+ t1
Table public.t1
Column | Type | Modifiers | Description
+--+---+-
Contains OIDs: yes
yes and no are missing _( ) around it.
---(end of
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Patch applied. Thanks.
Should this be backpatched to 7.4.X? The patch didn't apply cleanly to
that CVS branch.
No. support for sequences was only introduced onto the 7.5
tree/head. Same with the support for transaction files.
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 04:45, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
yes and no are missing _( ) around it.
Good catch! I fixed that and applied the patch.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fabien COELHO wrote:
(1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions
I thought Peter didn't like it.
He asked 'why' I needed it. I answered his question.
He may or may not agree, I don't know!
Would you repost and we can review
(1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions
I thought Peter didn't like it.
He asked 'why' I needed it. I answered his question.
He may or may not agree, I don't know!
Would you repost and we can review it again.
Ok.
(2) Date:
Fabien COELHO wrote:
Patch applied. Thanks.
I have 3 others somehow minor patches that are being submitted:
(1) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 17:36:55 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [PATCHES] aclitem accessor functions
I thought Peter didn't like it. Would you repost and we can review it
again.
13 matches
Mail list logo
