Re: [PATCHES] Win32 Version patch

2004-10-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. I made the wording correction suggested by Dave Page. Cleaned up patch attached. I think the impact is minimal as I renamed some things and moved the binary description up to the top of the Makefile so it looks like a comment.

Re: [PATCHES] pg_dumpall bug in PG 8.0b3 Win32 port

2004-10-05 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Luiz K. Matsumura wrote: Hi, I tried to use pg_dumpall in Win32 and receive a error message like this: pg_dump.exe: [archiver (db)] connection to database test failed: FATAL: user 'postgres' does not exist Well, the word 'postgres' is the word is between simple quotations marks and later

Re: [PATCHES] Support LDFLAGS_SL on most ports

2004-10-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
I haven't reviewed it yet. --- Oliver Jowett wrote: Oliver Jowett wrote: This patch includes LDFLAGS_SL in SHLIB_LINK on most ports (previously it was only used on AIX and BeOS), and adds support for specifying it in

[PATCHES] pg_config fixes

2004-10-05 Thread Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Hi, This simple patch fixes a typo, ensure pg_config is removed in win32 and correct some splitted message mistake. Please apply. PS I'll send the translated file soon. = Euler Taveira de Oliveira euler[at]yahoo_com_br

[PATCHES] s_lock_test build fix

2004-10-05 Thread Neil Conway
This trivial patch allows make -C src/backend/storage/lmgr/ s_lock_test to succeed in vpath builds. Barring any objections I intend to apply this within 24 hours. -Neil Index: src/backend/storage/lmgr/Makefile === RCS file:

[PATCHES] pg_dumpall bug in PG 8.0b3 Win32 port

2004-10-05 Thread Luiz K. Matsumura
Hi, I tried to use pg_dumpall in Win32 and receive a error message like this: pg_dump.exe: [archiver (db)] connection to database test failed: FATAL: user 'postgres' does not exist Well, the word 'postgres' is the word is between simple quotations marks and later between double quotations

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0

2004-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
Abhijit Menon-Sen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I decided against bundling the two operations together. Here's a patch to add PQprepare() and PQsendPrepare() in a fairly self-contained way. Any thoughts? Does this look good enough for 8.0? Seems OK as far as it goes, but a complete patch would

Re: [PATCHES] libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0

2004-10-05 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
At 2004-10-05 17:48:27 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Searching for all references to one of the existing entry points such as PQexecPrepared will probably help you identify what you need to do. OK. I've attached two additional patches below. I don't really understand how the *.def files

Re: [PATCHES] libpq and prepared statements progress for 8.0

2004-10-05 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
At 2004-09-20 13:24:47 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It depends on whether you think that PQprepare should bundle the Describe Statement operation or not. I decided against bundling the two operations together. Here's a patch to add PQprepare() and PQsendPrepare() in a fairly self-contained