There is. I beleive QueryPerformanceCounter has sub-mirosecond
resolution.
Can we just replace gettimeofday() with a version that's basically:
No, because it's also used for actual time-of-day calls. It'd be
necessary to hack executor/instrument.c in particular.
Here's a patch that does
On Sun, 2005-03-20 at 14:42 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
There is. I beleive QueryPerformanceCounter has sub-mirosecond
resolution.
Can we just replace gettimeofday() with a version that's basically:
No, because it's also used for actual time-of-day calls. It'd be
necessary to hack
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's a patch that does just this.
This seems about the ugliest and most intrusive way you could have
done it :-(. A judicious typedef and macro or two could eliminate
most of the #ifdefs and code duplication, thereby preserving
readability...
Here's a patch that does just this.
This seems about the ugliest and most intrusive way you could have
done it :-(. A judicious typedef and macro or two could eliminate
most of the #ifdefs and code duplication, thereby preserving
readability...
Well, I certainly can't argue with that, now that
Magnus Hagander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is a second attempt, hope it's closer to what you expected.
Better --- patch applied with some minor editorialization.
I still left two #ifdefs in there, for the addition and subtraction of
timeval:s specifically. They could be made
Marko Kreen wrote:
Here are various updates for pgcrypto that
I've been sitting on for some time now.
I'll apply all these later today, barring any objections.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the
Michael Fuhr wrote:
Should the PL/Python documentation mention this behavior?
Isn't this the behavior the user would expect? If so, I guess it's okay
not to document it.
How should I submit regression tests?
Yes, please.
*** src/pl/plpython/plpython.c 17 Dec 2004 02:14:48 - 1.58
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Is there any reason why HeapTupleSatisfiesUpdate return codes are not an
enum, like they are for HeapTupleSatisfiesVacuum?
Applied, thanks.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an
Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does this work for \r\n embedded in string literals?
I believe we'd concluded that Python will unconditionally convert all
\r\n to \n when reading any text file --- including script files ---
and therefore that's what Python programmers will expect to have
My letter was rejected so I uploaded the attachement:
http://school.tar.hu/maybe_a_dll_bug.zip
Here is the letter itself:
Now I send you [...]
a bug report (maybe_a_dll_bug.zip). I think it's not a
libpq.dll bug, but a related one at least. I would
very much appreciate your help.
Tom Lane wrote:
I'd view this as a postmaster state that propagates to backends.
Probably you'd enable it by means of a postmaster option, and the
only way to get out of it is to shut down and restart the postmaster
without the option.
I've created a patch to make a
Marko Kreen wrote:
Here are various updates for pgcrypto that
I've been sitting on for some time now.
Thanks, applied.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 10:28:28AM +1100, Neil Conway wrote:
Michael Fuhr wrote:
How should I submit regression tests?
Yes, please.
The operative word there was how :-) I don't see anything testing
PL/{Python,Perl,Tcl} under src/test/regress -- should I put something
there? Can
Michael Fuhr [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The operative word there was how :-) I don't see anything testing
PL/{Python,Perl,Tcl} under src/test/regress -- should I put something
there?
No.
The PLs have their own regression tests in their individual src/pl
directories; feel free to hack on those
14 matches
Mail list logo
