Folks,
Please find attached a patch which tells about what the spiffy,
integrated autovacuum now does :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
Remember to vote!
? autovacuum.diff
? d0m41n_fux0r3d.diff
Index: doc/src/sgml/
Oliver Jowett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> So the postmaster-log message may be the best we can do ...
>> but I don't think we should drop the connection.
> Here's a patch to do that; it appears to work as intended on my Linux
> system.
Applied along with some other marginal c
Tom Lane wrote:
As far as I could tell by eyeball, you are simply moving the section out
to be a separate chapter and a separate file, without changing any text?
Sorry, I should have noted that explicitly in my original email. The
vast majority of the patch is just moving the same text to a se
Tom Lane wrote:
> So the postmaster-log message may be the best we can do ...
> but I don't think we should drop the connection.
Here's a patch to do that; it appears to work as intended on my Linux
system.
-O
Index: src/backend/libpq/pqcomm.c
=
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Moreover, I don't agree with the premise. Could you point to the
>> discussion?
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2004-11/msg00029.php
As far as I could tell by eyeball, you are simply moving the section out
to be a
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Conway wrote:
>> Barring any objections, I'd like to apply this later tonight or
>> tomorrow, before the tree drifts.
> We are in beta; the time for major reorganizations has passed.
That would be a valid objection to a code reorganization, but
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
We are in beta; the time for major reorganizations has passed.
This is not a major reorganization.
In any case, the primary reason to avoid major reorganizations during
beta is the risk of regressions, which does not really apply here.
Moreover, I don't agree with th
Neil Conway wrote:
> Barring any objections, I'd like to apply this later tonight or
> tomorrow, before the tree drifts.
We are in beta; the time for major reorganizations has passed.
Moreover, I don't agree with the premise. Could you point to the
discussion?
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://devel
This patch moves the documentation of the configuration parameters into
a separate chapter; it was formerly a section in the "Server Run-time
Environment" chapter. This is per earlier discussion.
Because of the volume of SGML being moved, the patch is fairly large
(~360KB uncompressed), but ve
