Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump --clean w/ = 7.2 server
Where are we on this? --- Tom Lane wrote: Kris Jurka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Possibly the most correct solution is to assign the name public to the dummy schema that pg_dump creates internally when talking to a pre-7.3 server. I was considering that they might want to restore the dump into another schema and that would be easier with an unqualified name. I don't really understand why the name needs to be fully qualified in the first place. Because it's entirely too likely that you'll drop the wrong thing if you issue an unqualified DROP. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump --clean w/ = 7.2 server
When running pg_dump --clean against a server that doesn't have schemas the namespace is blank and ends up producing a dump full off things like: DROP TABLE .tab; Since the person is dumping using 7.5 pg_dump, presumably they will be restoring to 7.5, and it should be: DROP TABLE public.tab; Chris ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump --clean w/ = 7.2 server
Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When running pg_dump --clean against a server that doesn't have schemas the namespace is blank and ends up producing a dump full off things like: DROP TABLE .tab; Since the person is dumping using 7.5 pg_dump, presumably they will be restoring to 7.5, and it should be: DROP TABLE public.tab; Possibly the most correct solution is to assign the name public to the dummy schema that pg_dump creates internally when talking to a pre-7.3 server. I seem to recall that there was some reason for using , but I don't recall what exactly. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump --clean w/ = 7.2 server
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Tom Lane wrote: Christopher Kings-Lynne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: When running pg_dump --clean against a server that doesn't have schemas the namespace is blank and ends up producing a dump full off things like: DROP TABLE .tab; Since the person is dumping using 7.5 pg_dump, presumably they will be restoring to 7.5, and it should be: DROP TABLE public.tab; Possibly the most correct solution is to assign the name public to the dummy schema that pg_dump creates internally when talking to a pre-7.3 server. I was considering that they might want to restore the dump into another schema and that would be easier with an unqualified name. I don't really understand why the name needs to be fully qualified in the first place. I seem to recall that there was some reason for using , but I don't recall what exactly. It seems like the only possible reasons are deliberately making it fail or just a lack of testing. There's no way it does anything useful. Kris Jurka ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump --clean w/ = 7.2 server
Kris Jurka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Possibly the most correct solution is to assign the name public to the dummy schema that pg_dump creates internally when talking to a pre-7.3 server. I was considering that they might want to restore the dump into another schema and that would be easier with an unqualified name. I don't really understand why the name needs to be fully qualified in the first place. Because it's entirely too likely that you'll drop the wrong thing if you issue an unqualified DROP. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
