Re: [PATCHES] snprintf improvements

2005-03-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Peter Eisentraut wrote: Am Mittwoch, 2. M?rz 2005 15:48 schrieb Bruce Momjian: This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is enabled, and I added support for %qd and %I64d in snprintf. We might need those in the final version if it is exported to apps. test -a is not

Re: [PATCHES] snprintf improvements

2005-03-02 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is enabled, I see no point in this; it does not solve any problem we need solved, only complicate the configuration behavior even more. I added support for %qd and %I64d in snprintf. I

Re: [PATCHES] snprintf improvements

2005-03-02 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is enabled, I see no point in this; it does not solve any problem we need solved, only complicate the configuration behavior even more. I think this is analogous to

Re: [PATCHES] snprintf improvements

2005-03-02 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes: This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is enabled, I see no point in this; it does not solve any problem we need solved, only complicate the configuration behavior even more. Peter answered this. I added