Dave Page wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Dave Page wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> Simon Riggs wrote:
> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> not sure what the pro
Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files.
>>> Then I have no clue.
>
>> Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments.
>
> I think the filter is not on
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Simon Riggs wrote:
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
not sure what the problem is?
Sent: 31 Mar
Dave Page wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> >> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> >> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> >> not sure what the problem is?
> >>
> >> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
> >> Sen
Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files.
>>
>> Then I have no clue.
> Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments.
I think the filter is not on the name or actual conte
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
>> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
>> not sure what the problem is?
>>
>> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
>> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
>
> Wha
"Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Plaintext patch, plus two plaintext .c files.
>
> Then I have no clue.
Actually I've had more success with .tar.gz than plain text attachments.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
---
Simon Riggs wrote:
> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> not sure what the problem is?
>
> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
What an obvious ploy to get more ti
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:08:08PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 19:40 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> > > now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 19:40 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> > now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> > not sure what the problem is?
> >
> > Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01
Simon Riggs wrote:
> I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
> now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
> not sure what the problem is?
>
> Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
> Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
Did you by any chance send it in .t
I've sent through v10 of my patch for transaction guarantee = off twice
now and it hasn't shown up on-list. I don't appear to be blocked, so I'm
not sure what the problem is?
Sent: 31 Mar 22:09 TZ+01:00
Sent: 1 Apr 12:11 TZ+01:00
--
Simon Riggs
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterpr
12 matches
Mail list logo