Re: [PATCHES] Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters

2005-05-11 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Tom Lane wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: This patch will ensure that the hash table iteration performed by AtCommit_Portals is restarted when a portal is deleted. I have applied the following patch. I assume it is too risky for backpatch to 8.0.X. I don't think it's appropriate in

Re: [PATCHES] Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters

2005-05-11 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: >> This patch will ensure that the hash table iteration performed by >> AtCommit_Portals is restarted when a portal is deleted. > I have applied the following patch. I assume it is too risky for > backpatch to 8.0.X. I don't think it's appropriate in HEAD either --- it do

Re: [PATCHES] Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters

2005-05-11 Thread Bruce Momjian
Thomas Hallgren wrote: > This patch will ensure that the hash table iteration performed by > AtCommit_Portals is restarted when a portal is deleted. This is > necessary since the deletion of a portal may cause the deletion of > another which on rare occations may cause the iterator to return a

Re: [PATCHES] Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters

2005-04-24 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. --- Th

Re: [PATCHES] Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters

2005-03-16 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Tom Lane wrote: Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I'm not sure what you mean. Earlier you rejected my bug-report on the iterator because you it was the callers responsability to deal with it (hence this patch). Are you now suggesting that we fix that bug instead? Quite honestly,

Re: [PATCHES] Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters

2005-03-15 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm not sure what you mean. Earlier you rejected my bug-report on the > iterator because you it was the callers responsability to deal with it > (hence this patch). Are you now suggesting that we fix that bug instead? Quite honestly, I dunno. I agre

Re: [PATCHES] Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters

2005-03-15 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Tom Lane wrote: Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thomas Hallgren wrote: This patch will ensure that the hash table iteration performed by AtCommit_Portals is restarted when a portal is deleted. I'll apply this to HEAD within 24 hours, barring any objections. I don't b

Re: [PATCHES] Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters

2005-03-15 Thread Tom Lane
Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Hallgren wrote: >> This patch will ensure that the hash table iteration performed by >> AtCommit_Portals is restarted when a portal is deleted. > I'll apply this to HEAD within 24 hours, barring any objections. I don't believe that this actually f

Re: [PATCHES] Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters

2005-03-15 Thread Neil Conway
Thomas Hallgren wrote: This patch will ensure that the hash table iteration performed by AtCommit_Portals is restarted when a portal is deleted. This is necessary since the deletion of a portal may cause the deletion of another which on rare occations may cause the iterator to return a deleted

[PATCHES] Patch that deals with that AtCommit_Portals encounters deleted entries

2005-02-27 Thread Thomas Hallgren
This patch will ensure that the hash table iteration performed by AtCommit_Portals is restarted when a portal is deleted. This is necessary since the deletion of a portal may cause the deletion of another which on rare occations may cause the iterator to return a deleted portal an thus a renewe