Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, is this a feature we want?
I have no objection to being able to use Sun Studio, but the submitted
patch seemed to need a lot of work yet ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-patches mailing list (pgsql-patches@postgresql
So, is this a feature we want?
---
Julius Stroffek wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > This patch seems broken in a number of ways. Why are you removing
> > -DLINUX_PROFILE, for example? Are you sure you don't need -D_GNU_SOURCE?
Tom Lane wrote:
This patch seems broken in a number of ways. Why are you removing
-DLINUX_PROFILE, for example? Are you sure you don't need -D_GNU_SOURCE?
And why add -DSUNOS4_CC, which is a Solaris-specific define (not that
we seem to be using it anywhere anymore)? Do we really have to have a
Tom Lane napsal(a):
But I guess the *real* question is why anyone would care ... what
benefit is there to using Sun's compiler on Linux?
There are severals benefits:
1) Sun Studio is not only compiler. It has a lot of tools like
performance analyzer/profiler, memory checker ... There are gr
Julius Stroffek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have made PostgreSQL to compile on linux using sun studio with
> spinlock support. The patch is attached. Here is the explanation of
> changes I made:
This patch seems broken in a number of ways. Why are you removing
-DLINUX_PROFILE, for example?
Hi All,
I have made PostgreSQL to compile on linux using sun studio with
spinlock support. The patch is attached. Here is the explanation of
changes I made:
I renamed the following files
solaris_x86.s
solaris_sparch.s
to
sunstudio_x86.s
sunstudio_sparch.s
because the code is used on linux a
