Re: [PATCHES] Win32 bug fix
I'll compile and test this in a morning. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Claudio Natoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:20 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Win32 bug fix Could someone please eyeball the attached patch for errors and as a correction for: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2004-08/msg00307.php Also, could someone (Maksim?) please reproduce the bug on their system, and then confirm that the patch corrects (as I seem unable to reproduce the bug, which in itself is a mystery I don't have time to solve :-) Cheers, Claudio --- Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see a href=http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html;http://www.me metrics.com/em ailpolicy.html/a ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html
Re: [PATCHES] Win32 bug fix
Compiled and tried, seems much better, no more WAIT_FAIL errors. but I have some questions: 1. Is there a any possibility to assign server log file ( option -l,--log ) when PG runs as a service, I wasn't able to do that, dump everything into stderror or eventlog just not convenient. 2. What is a theoretical and practical number of the concurrent connection? I'm asking this question due to following, as right now each child corresponds to a thread, problem is thread reserves 1MB of V address space, so technically we are talking about 2/3K of concurrent connections top, depending of Windows configuration (3GB flag). But 2K of connection still pretty decent number comparing to less then 60 for cygwin. Thanks. -Original Message- From: Claudio Natoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:20 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Win32 bug fix Could someone please eyeball the attached patch for errors and as a correction for: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2004-08/msg00307.php Also, could someone (Maksim?) please reproduce the bug on their system, and then confirm that the patch corrects (as I seem unable to reproduce the bug, which in itself is a mystery I don't have time to solve :-) Cheers, Claudio --- Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see a href=http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html;http://www.me metrics.com/em ailpolicy.html/a ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
Re: [PATCHES] Win32 bug fix
Maksim Likharev wrote: Compiled and tried, seems much better, no more WAIT_FAIL errors. but I have some questions: 1. Is there a any possibility to assign server log file ( option -l,--log ) when PG runs as a service, I wasn't able to do that, dump everything into stderror or eventlog just not convenient. Use redirect_stderr. Regards, Andreas ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Re: [PATCHES] Win32 bug fix
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Claudio Natoli wrote: Could someone please eyeball the attached patch for errors and as a correction for: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2004-08/msg00307.php Also, could someone (Maksim?) please reproduce the bug on their system, and then confirm that the patch corrects (as I seem unable to reproduce the bug, which in itself is a mystery I don't have time to solve :-) Cheers, Claudio --- Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see a href=http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html;http://www.memetrics.com/em ailpolicy.html/a [ Attachment, skipping... ] ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup.| Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073 ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
[PATCHES] Win32 bug fix
Could someone please eyeball the attached patch for errors and as a correction for: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2004-08/msg00307.php Also, could someone (Maksim?) please reproduce the bug on their system, and then confirm that the patch corrects (as I seem unable to reproduce the bug, which in itself is a mystery I don't have time to solve :-) Cheers, Claudio --- Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see a href=http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html;http://www.memetrics.com/em ailpolicy.html/a diff.patch Description: Binary data ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
