Re: [PATCHES] table/index fillfactor control, try 3

2006-07-02 Thread Tom Lane
ITAGAKI Takahiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thank you for applying, but sorry, my patch has some incompletions. I'm busy reviewing/reworking this patch, and will deal with these items. > 2. Add a comment on the average FSM request size. Now, the size > contains not only the size of tupl

Re: [PATCHES] table/index fillfactor control, try 3

2006-07-02 Thread ITAGAKI Takahiro
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patch applied. Thanks. Thank you for applying, but sorry, my patch has some incompletions. 1. A debug code is left. Assert() and if-test are redundant. 2. Add a comment on the average FSM request size. Now, the size contains not only the size o

Re: [PATCHES] table/index fillfactor control, try 3

2006-07-01 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. Catalog version updated. --- ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote: > This is the 3rd revised fillfactor patch. > Now, AM specific options are stored in pg_class.reloptions as text[]. > Also, some bugs are fixed.

[PATCHES] table/index fillfactor control, try 3

2006-06-21 Thread ITAGAKI Takahiro
This is the 3rd revised fillfactor patch. Now, AM specific options are stored in pg_class.reloptions as text[]. Also, some bugs are fixed. It passed all regression tests. Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An opaque bytea won't do though. What I'd suggest is something real > close to the for