Re: [pgsql-patches] [PATCHES] pg_standby

2007-02-16 Thread Bruce Momjian
Robert Treat wrote: > At the risk of starting trouble, is there some reason this was added to > contrib and not put on pgfoundry ? I thought the idea was that it was integral to using PITR, but might change so it was put in /contrib. > > On Thursday 08 February 2007 10:09, Bruce Momjian wrote:

Re: [pgsql-patches] [PATCHES] pg_standby

2007-02-16 Thread Robert Treat
At the risk of starting trouble, is there some reason this was added to contrib and not put on pgfoundry ? On Thursday 08 February 2007 10:09, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Patch applied. Thanks. > > --- > > Simon Riggs wrote: > >

Re: [pgsql-patches] [PATCHES] pg_standby

2007-02-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 16:15 +, Simon Riggs wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 10:05 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote: > > > On 12/28/06, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [pgsql-patches] [PATCHES] pg_standby

2007-01-30 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. --- Si

Re: [pgsql-patches] [PATCHES] pg_standby

2007-01-22 Thread Simon Riggs
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 16:15 +, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 10:05 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote: > > On 12/28/06, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 19:26 +, Simon Riggs wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 12:04 +, Simon Riggs wrote: > > > >

Re: [pgsql-patches] [PATCHES] pg_standby

2007-01-17 Thread Merlin Moncure
On 1/17/07, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: new v4 Changes - removed -m command, design flaw in original spec, use -l instead - added -k N command to cleanup archive and leave max N files - fflush() points added to allow Windows debug - bug fix: when .history file present - bug fix: comma

Re: [pgsql-patches] [PATCHES] pg_standby

2007-01-17 Thread Merlin Moncure
On 1/17/07, Merlin Moncure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/17/07, Doug Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I confirm that I am seeing the exact same characteristic. Could you post > your rotating script? note: this is still a work in progress, the crude but effective sleep 5 is due to be repla

Re: [pgsql-patches] [PATCHES] pg_standby

2007-01-17 Thread Merlin Moncure
On 1/17/07, Doug Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I confirm that I am seeing the exact same characteristic. Could you post your rotating script? note: this is still a work in progress, the crude but effective sleep 5 is due to be replaced with a lock/fifo and there catch_wal.sh needs to be r

Re: [pgsql-patches] [PATCHES] pg_standby

2007-01-17 Thread Doug Knight
I confirm that I am seeing the exact same characteristic. Could you post your rotating script? Thanks, Doug On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 10:05 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote: > On 12/28/06, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 19:26 +, Simon Riggs wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-12

Re: [pgsql-patches] [PATCHES] pg_standby

2007-01-17 Thread Merlin Moncure
On 12/28/06, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 19:26 +, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 12:04 +, Simon Riggs wrote: > > pg_standby and test framework, in separate .tar files > > New version (v2), following further testing. > > Signal handling not incl