> People seem to be confusing sector size and cluster size.
>
> Microsoft Windows assumes sectors are 8k or less on hard drives (99% are
> 512 bytes).
Do you have any doc ref for this? I beleive you but I've been searching for
docs on that and found nothing.
>
> Cluster size is the allocation
> >> I think many people can benefit from Itagaki-san's proposal, and
> >> NO_BUFFERING should be default. Isn't it very rare that disks with
> >> sector size larger than 8KB are used?
> >
> > Definitly very rare.
> >
> >
> >> Providing a way (such as
> >> wal_sync_method) to avoid NO_BUFFERING is
Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > In any case I'd like to see some evidence of significant real-world
> > benefit before adding such a conceptual wart ...
>
> I've asked our testers to do a TPC-C run with and without the
> patch. I'm not expecting it to make
On 12/28/06, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 19:26 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 12:04 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > pg_standby and test framework, in separate .tar files
>
> New version (v2), following further testing.
>
> Signal handling not incl
I confirm that I am seeing the exact same characteristic. Could you post
your rotating script?
Thanks,
Doug
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 10:05 -0500, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On 12/28/06, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 19:26 +, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2006-12
On 1/17/07, Doug Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I confirm that I am seeing the exact same characteristic. Could you post
your rotating script?
note: this is still a work in progress, the crude but effective sleep
5 is due to be replaced with a lock/fifo and there catch_wal.sh needs
to be r
On 1/17/07, Merlin Moncure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 1/17/07, Doug Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I confirm that I am seeing the exact same characteristic. Could you post
> your rotating script?
note: this is still a work in progress, the crude but effective sleep
5 is due to be repla
BTW: From the current FAT/FAT32 source code fsctrl.c (which I have via
Microsoft's IFS kit), when it checks the boot sector for validity:
//
// Enforce some sanity on the sector size (easy check)
//
} else if ((Bpb.BytesPerSector != 128) &&
(Bpb.BytesPerSector !=
On 1/17/07, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
new v4
Changes
- removed -m command, design flaw in original spec, use -l instead
- added -k N command to cleanup archive and leave max N files
- fflush() points added to allow Windows debug
- bug fix: when .history file present
- bug fix: comma
On Sunday 14 January 2007 23:16, Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On 1/13/07, Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It was already possible to set the guc on postgresql.conf when I posted
> > the patch...
>
> ok... fixed... the problem was that this code only let
> num_temp_tablespaces be grea
10 matches
Mail list logo