On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 01:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 17:10 -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> I don't like your wording though; it feels too verbose (and you're
> >> losing the ANALYZE in case it's doing both things). How about
> >
Simon,
I agree with adding these options in general, since I find myself
frustrated by having to vi huge dumps to change simple schema things.
A couple of comments on the patch though:
- Conflicting option handling
I think we are doing our users a disservice by putting it on them to
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 23:07 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Simon,
>
> I agree with adding these options in general, since I find myself
> frustrated by having to vi huge dumps to change simple schema things.
> A couple of comments on the patch though:
>
> - Conflicting option handling
>
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 05:47 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 23:07 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Simon,
> >
> > I agree with adding these options in general, since I find myself
> > frustrated by having to vi huge dumps to change simple schema things.
> > A couple of comm
