Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I wonder if we should take pg_read_file (and the rest of genfile.c)
back out of the backend and stick them into contrib/adminpack.
I thought about that but what we have in the backend now is read-only
which basically could be done usi
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Uh, I just added /contrib/adminpack a few weeks ago to CVS, which does
this, and more. Sorry I forgot to mark the TODO item as completed.
Huh, how do you read files with adminpack?
try
select * from pg_logdir_ls() as (filetime timestamp, filena
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Uh, I just added /contrib/adminpack a few weeks ago to CVS, which does
this, and more. Sorry I forgot to mark the TODO item as completed.
---
1. int8 pg_catalog.pg_file_read(fname text, data text
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I wonder if we should take pg_read_file (and the rest of genfile.c)
back out of the backend and stick them into contrib/adminpack.
I thought about that but what we have in the backend now is re
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I wonder if we should take pg_read_file (and the rest of genfile.c)
> >> back out of the backend and stick them into contrib/adminpack.
>
> > I thought about that but what we have in the backend now is read-only
> > which basically
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wonder if we should take pg_read_file (and the rest of genfile.c)
>> back out of the backend and stick them into contrib/adminpack.
> I thought about that but what we have in the backend now is read-only
> which basically could be done using COPY, so I
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Is that wrong? Yes. Looking at the C file, I see what you mean. Let
> > me update the README.adminpack file. read_file is already in the
> > backend code, and was in 8.1.X too.
>
> I wonder if we should take pg_read_file (and the rest of genfile.c)
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Is that wrong? Yes. Looking at the C file, I see what you mean. Let
> me update the README.adminpack file. read_file is already in the
> backend code, and was in 8.1.X too.
I wonder if we should take pg_read_file (and the rest of genfile.c)
back out of the backend and
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > > Uh, I just added /contrib/adminpack a few weeks ago to CVS, which does
> > > this, and more. Sorry I forgot to mark the TODO item as completed.
> >
> > Huh, how do you read files with adminpack? I only see
> >
>
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Uh, I just added /contrib/adminpack a few weeks ago to CVS, which does
> > this, and more. Sorry I forgot to mark the TODO item as completed.
>
> Huh, how do you read files with adminpack? I only see
>
> Datum pg_file_write(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Uh, I just added /contrib/adminpack a few weeks ago to CVS, which does
> this, and more. Sorry I forgot to mark the TODO item as completed.
Huh, how do you read files with adminpack? I only see
Datum pg_file_write(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS);
Datum pg_file_rename(PG_FUNCTION_ARG
Uh, I just added /contrib/adminpack a few weeks ago to CVS, which does
this, and more. Sorry I forgot to mark the TODO item as completed.
---
Dhanaraj M wrote:
> The patch is attached for the following TODO item:
>
> *Allo
The patch is attached for the following TODO item:
*Allow server logs to be remotely read.
Steps:
1. When the server starts (**pg_ctl start)**, the path of the postmaster file is stored
2. The user can access the logfile using the following 2 functions:
* pg_file_readlog(int linenumber) -
13 matches
Mail list logo
