Re: [PATCHES] TM formating patch

2007-02-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. I have not backpatched it to 8.2.X because I am unclear of the risk involved. Suggestions? --- Pavel Stehule wrote: Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch correct bug, when

Re: [PATCHES] TM formating patch

2007-02-08 Thread Pavel Stehule
Patch applied. Thanks. I have not backpatched it to 8.2.X because I am unclear of the risk involved. Suggestions? It's bug in 8.2. I don't know about any risks for 8.2 Pavel --- Pavel Stehule wrote: Pavel

Re: [PATCHES] TM formating patch

2007-02-08 Thread Bruce Momjian
Pavel Stehule wrote: Patch applied. Thanks. I have not backpatched it to 8.2.X because I am unclear of the risk involved. Suggestions? It's bug in 8.2. I don't know about any risks for 8.2 OK, I have backpatched it to 8.2.X.

Re: [PATCHES] TM formating patch

2007-02-07 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. ---

Re: [PATCHES] TM formating patch

2007-02-05 Thread Tom Lane
Pavel Stehule [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This patch correct bug, when localized day or month names was incorectly trnasformed to lower or upper string. I really dislike the API you've chosen for upper_str/lower_str --- overwriting the input on the assumption that it's long enough is a buffer

[PATCHES] TM formating patch

2007-02-04 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hello, I am sorry for preview chotic mails. My web email client is stupid (I am too). This patch correct bug, when localized day or month names was incorectly trnasformed to lower or upper string. Regards Pavel Stehule _