On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 03:19:43PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:31:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > OK, but why would we document the contents of a file that are not to be
> > > modified by the user?
> >
> > But how is the file used?
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But how is the file used? Where do I put the file, what do I put in
> pg_hba.conf to use the file? Can I have several files, one per
> pg_hba.conf entry? Can I use multiple files with a single pg_hba.conf
> entry? What happens if I have a username th
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:31:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > OK, but why would we document the contents of a file that are not to be
> > modified by the user?
>
> But how is the file used? Where do I put the file, what do I put in
> pg_hba.conf to use the file? C
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:31:37PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> OK, but why would we document the contents of a file that are not to be
> modified by the user?
But how is the file used? Where do I put the file, what do I put in
pg_hba.conf to use the file? Can I have several files, one per
pg_
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> OK, but why would we document the contents of a file that are not to be
> modified by the user?
Also note that the 7.2 docs are out of date anyway (looks to me like
we use spaces not colons as column separators...)
regards, tom l
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:18:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> Something that bugged me a lot is that I tried to find the format of the
> > >> file for testing the patch, and I couldn't find anything anywhere in the
> > >> docs. Apparently the docs for the file were ripped with the docs fo
OK, but why would we document the contents of a file that are not to be
modified by the user?
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:18:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > > >> Something that bugged me a
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Alvaro, you call GetParentTransactionId(), but I see not definition for
> > it in the code.
>
> It looks like Alvaro forgot to include diffs for xact.c in that patch.
> I imagine what he had in mind was to add such a function to xact.
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alvaro, you call GetParentTransactionId(), but I see not definition for
> it in the code.
It looks like Alvaro forgot to include diffs for xact.c in that patch.
I imagine what he had in mind was to add such a function to xact.c.
I would like to counsel
Patch withdrawn by author.
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> An untested patch to update the password file.
>
> Something that bugged me a lot is that I tried to find the format of the
> file for testing the patch, and I couldn't
OK. Also, I would like you to post a list of the open items you have so
we can all know the status.
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:05:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Alvaro, you call GetPar
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:05:40PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Alvaro, you call GetParentTransactionId(), but I see not definition for
> it in the code.
Let me include this patch in the next patch I'll submit shortly.
--
Alvaro Herrera ()
"I suspect most samba developers are already technic
Alvaro, you call GetParentTransactionId(), but I see not definition for
it in the code.
---
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> An untested patch to update the password file.
>
> Something that bugged me a lot is that I tried to find t
An untested patch to update the password file.
Something that bugged me a lot is that I tried to find the format of the
file for testing the patch, and I couldn't find anything anywhere in the
docs. Apparently the docs for the file were ripped with the docs for
the pg_passwd utility when it was r
14 matches
Mail list logo