Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-05-04 Thread Tom Lane
George Gensure [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The new function name is pg_conf_load_time() Applied with revisions. I'm now using LWLocks only on the backend in order to protect the PgReloadTime from mid copy reads. This may prove to be unnecessary, since the code to handle HUPs seems to be

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-05-02 Thread George Gensure
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 12:58 PM, George Gensure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: George Gensure escribió: I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the administration TODO. I was a little

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-05-02 Thread Alvaro Herrera
George Gensure escribió: So if nobody's got any further objections, could this patch be applied? It's in the queue: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest:May -- Alvaro Herrerahttp://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. --

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-05-02 Thread George Gensure
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: George Gensure escribió: So if nobody's got any further objections, could this patch be applied? It's in the queue: http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/CommitFest:May -- Alvaro Herrera

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-04-30 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
Gurjeet Singh wrote: On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:53 AM, George Gensure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the administration TODO. I was a little paranoid with the locking, but didn't want problems to occur with signals on the postmaster and the

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-04-30 Thread Alvaro Herrera
George Gensure escribió: I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the administration TODO. I was a little paranoid with the locking, but didn't want problems to occur with signals on the postmaster and the read side. I'd say too much -- postmaster runs with signals blocked

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-04-30 Thread George Gensure
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: George Gensure escribió: I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the administration TODO. I was a little paranoid with the locking, but didn't want problems to occur with signals on the

[PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-04-29 Thread George Gensure
I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the administration TODO. I was a little paranoid with the locking, but didn't want problems to occur with signals on the postmaster and the read side. -George *** ./doc/src/sgml/func.sgml.orig 2008-04-29 23:47:39.378726574 -0400 ---

Re: [PATCHES] pg_postmaster_reload_time() patch

2008-04-29 Thread Gurjeet Singh
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 9:53 AM, George Gensure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've done a quick write up for reload time reporting from the administration TODO. I was a little paranoid with the locking, but didn't want problems to occur with signals on the postmaster and the read side. IMHO,