Re: [PATCHES] sinval.c / sinvaladt.c restructuring

2008-03-16 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One side effect of this change is that the call to SendPostmasterSignal > now occurs after the lock has been released. ISTM this is a good idea > on general principles (no syscalls in lwlocked code), but I'm wondering > if I created a thundering hoard p

Re: [PATCHES] sinval.c / sinvaladt.c restructuring

2008-03-03 Thread Bruce Momjian
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews and approves it. --- Al

[PATCHES] sinval.c / sinvaladt.c restructuring

2008-02-29 Thread Alvaro Herrera
I just modified the interactions in sinval.c and sinvaladt.c per http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.db.postgresql.devel.patches/18820/focus=18822 It looks a lot saner this way: the code that actually deals with the queue, including locking etc, is all in sinvaladt.c. This means that the struct de