On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 02:40:42PM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi Magnus.
>
> From: "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> >I see the problem now. In my dev kit, there is no error for using
> >_USE_32BIT_TIME_T on Win64. That's why I got caught up in your patch being
> >wrong.
>
> Umm,..
On 08/01/2008, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:02:24AM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> A question there though - do we care about the length of time_t on client
> platforms, or should we instead just disable the whole check for the
> client? AFAICS we don't ex
Hi Magnus.
From: "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I see the problem now. In my dev kit, there is no error for using
_USE_32BIT_TIME_T on Win64. That's why I got caught up in your patch being
wrong.
Umm,... It is very strange.?_?
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio 8\VC\include\crtd
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:02:24AM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> >On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:19:54AM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> >>Ummm, Sorry...former patch to be disregarded.
> >>Although 64bit mak is
Hi.
- Original Message -
From: "Magnus Hagander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:19:54AM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
Ummm, Sorry...former patch to be disregarded.
Although 64bit mak is experimental, it needs to be compiled.
Please apply this.
Is this really correc
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 11:19:54AM +0900, Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Ummm, Sorry...former patch to be disregarded.
> Although 64bit mak is experimental, it needs to be compiled.
> Please apply this.
Is this really correct? Fromw hat I can tell you *both* tell us not to
check the value *and* set the
Ummm, Sorry...former patch to be disregarded.
Although 64bit mak is experimental, it needs to be compiled.
Please apply this.
- Original Message -
From: "Hiroshi Saito" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Magnus.
It is a thing left behind.:-(
Please apply it. thanks!
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
Hi Magnus.
It is a thing left behind.:-(
Please apply it. thanks!
Regards,
Hiroshi Saito
win32mak_patch
Description: Binary data
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Patch applied and backpatched for 8.2.X. Sorry it didn't make it into
8.2.0.
---
Hiroshi Saito wrote:
> Hi.
>
> The module link is insufficient.:-(
>
> Sorry, japanese message change to xxx ---
> link.exe @C:\DOCUME~
Hi.
The module link is insufficient.:-(
Sorry, japanese message change to xxx ---
link.exe @C:\DOCUME~1\hi-saito\LOCALS~1\Temp\nmk03360.
common.obj : error LNK2001: xx "_pg_qsort" xx
pg_dump_sort.obj : error LNK2001: x "_pg_qsort" x
.\Release\pg_dump.exe : fatal error LNK112
10 matches
Mail list logo