Re: [PATCHES] [Fwd: Re: [DOCS] How the planner uses statistics]
Tom Lane wrote: The internals section would be a good compromise. ISTM that in the context of the "performance tips" chapter, all that people really want to know is that the planner uses the pg_statistic entries to estimate numbers of matching rows --- just how it goes about it is irrelevant detail at that point. Yeah, it clearly is internals, now that you mention it .. :-) The whole 'it can get out of date' thing worries me a bit - however I guess everything in the internals section is a bit vulnerable to that (another reason for internals being the place to put it). Having said that, if it seems that this is really too much like reading the code to be in the docs at all, then another option is for it to go to one of the community sites (like varlena), where it could be (reformatted) and clearly marked as relevant for 7.x and 8.0 only. best wishes Mark ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [PATCHES] [Fwd: Re: [DOCS] How the planner uses statistics]
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Hmmm ... it strikes me that someone wanting this level of detail >> would be better advised to look into the source code. > I did wonder about about it being better placed in 'internals' > somewhere, but it seemed to follow on from the 'explain' and 'stats' > sections quite well. The internals section would be a good compromise. ISTM that in the context of the "performance tips" chapter, all that people really want to know is that the planner uses the pg_statistic entries to estimate numbers of matching rows --- just how it goes about it is irrelevant detail at that point. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
Re: [PATCHES] [Fwd: Re: [DOCS] How the planner uses statistics]
Tom Lane wrote: Hmmm ... it strikes me that someone wanting this level of detail would be better advised to look into the source code. I did wonder about about it being better placed in 'internals' somewhere, but it seemed to follow on from the 'explain' and 'stats' sections quite well. I certainly wouldn't want to promise that a chunk of documentation like this will stay up-to-date. Yeah - that is a concern... no doco is better than wrong doco :-) Mind you, ISTM that the same objection could be leveled at the 'stats' section best wishes Mark ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [PATCHES] [Fwd: Re: [DOCS] How the planner uses statistics]
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As discussed on -docs. Hmmm ... it strikes me that someone wanting this level of detail would be better advised to look into the source code. I certainly wouldn't want to promise that a chunk of documentation like this will stay up-to-date. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
