Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] large object regression tests

2006-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Sorry, please disregard. Was means for a Japanese FAQ update. --- Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Patch applied. Thanks. > > --- > > > Jeremy Drake wrote

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] large object regression tests

2006-10-14 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied. Thanks. --- Jeremy Drake wrote: > On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Jeremy Drake wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > I think we could do without the Moby Dick extract too ... > > > > I am open to

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] large object regression tests

2006-09-26 Thread Jeremy Drake
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Jeremy Drake wrote: > On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > > > I think we could do without the Moby Dick extract too ... > > I am open to suggestions. I saw one suggestion that I use an image of an > elephant, but I suspect that was tongue-in-cheek. I am not very fond of >

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] large object regression tests

2006-09-25 Thread Jeremy Drake
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Jeremy Drake wrote: > > It looks like the large_obj.c output is missing much of the output > settings handling which is in the PrintQueryStatus function in common.c, > such as handling quiet mode, and html output. I will try to dig around > and try to put together a patch to

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] large object regression tests

2006-09-24 Thread Bort, Paul
Jeremy Drake wrote: > > I am open to suggestions. I saw one suggestion that I use an > image of an elephant, but I suspect that was tongue-in-cheek. > I am not very fond of the idea of generating repetitious > data, as I think it would be more difficult to determine > whether or not the lose

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] large object regression tests

2006-09-24 Thread Jeremy Drake
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Jeremy Drake wrote: > On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > > > I suggest that instead of testing the server-side lo_import/lo_export > > functions, perhaps you could test the psql equivalents and write and > > read a file in psql's working directory. > > I did not see any pr

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] large object regression tests

2006-09-24 Thread Jeremy Drake
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I put together a patch which adds a regression test for large objects, > > hopefully attached to this message. I would like some critique of it, to > > see if I have gone about it the right way. Also I would be h

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] large object regression tests

2006-09-21 Thread Tom Lane
Jeremy Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I put together a patch which adds a regression test for large objects, > hopefully attached to this message. I would like some critique of it, to > see if I have gone about it the right way. Also I would be happy to hear > any additional tests which shou

Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] large object regression tests

2006-09-05 Thread Jeremy Drake
I put together a patch which adds a regression test for large objects, hopefully attached to this message. I would like some critique of it, to see if I have gone about it the right way. Also I would be happy to hear any additional tests which should be added to it. On Tue, 5 Sep 2006, Jeremy Dr