On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 00:39 -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
Correct several typos in the documentation.
Applied to HEAD -- thanks for the patch.
I also removed the comment from the cvs.sgml file.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: In versions
On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 00:39 -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
Correct several typos in the documentation.
Are there any remaining objections to this patch? Otherwise, I'll apply
it within 24 hours.
-Neil
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 4: Have you
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 06:18:08PM -0400, Neil Conway wrote:
On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 00:39 -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
Correct several typos in the documentation.
Are there any remaining objections to this patch? Otherwise, I'll apply
it within 24 hours.
I could submit a version with
On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 00:39 -0600, Michael Fuhr wrote:
*** doc/src/sgml/cvs.sgml 11 Aug 2005 13:52:33 - 1.34
--- doc/src/sgml/cvs.sgml 13 Oct 2005 06:15:38 -
***
*** 849,855
to you the malloc code and an additional installation e-mail from
John.
Michael Fuhr wrote:
I took the liberty of making the following spelling changes for
consistency with the rest of the documentation, even though the
originals are the preferred spellings in some parts of the English-
speaking world. I found only one or two instances of each; the
latter forms
Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there an official spelling standard for PostgreSQL?
There is not. Given that a substantial fraction of our community is
accustomed to British spellings, I've never felt that it was appropriate
to try to standardize either way. I just leave it the way
On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 09:55 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
You seem to have lots of time on your hands if you can worry about this.
How you spend it is your business, of course, but playing spelling cop
doesn't seem worth it to me.
I think it's a perfectly valid thing to fix. Part of quality
On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 10:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Given that a substantial fraction of our community is accustomed to
British spellings, I've never felt that it was appropriate to try to
standardize either way.
The same reasoning applies to the audience of (and contributors to) most
Michael Fuhr wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 09:55:55AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
You seem to have lots of time on your hands if you can worry about this.
How you spend it is your business, of course, but playing spelling cop
doesn't seem worth it to me.
Whether you agree or
On Thu, 2005-13-10 at 12:17 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
I don't agree that we need to force one spelling of common words when
many dictionaries recognise the validity of variant spellings.
There is obviously no need to force the use of one spelling variant or
another. However, I think it is
Michael Fuhr wrote:
That's 5 changes out of 245 total occurrences.
So what? I just don't see consistency as being a value in itself, but
only when it has some other merit. Clearly you don't agree, but I am
with Emerson on the subject of consistency.
cheers
andrew
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Is there an official spelling standard for PostgreSQL?
While nothing is ever really official around here, the documentation is
susceptible to being hit by my spell-checking tool, which has
historically tended to use whatever american aspell dictionary I had
installed at
Neil Conway wrote:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/fdp-primer/writing-s
tyle.html
I can heartily recommend this, and I have deferred to this many times
over the years.
I disagree with the point on Avoid redundant phrases, though, and in
fact it contradicts error message style
13 matches
Mail list logo
