Re: [PATCHES] Information_schema fixes for sequences and temporary tables

2006-08-18 Thread Greg Sabino Mullane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I'd be interested to see you cite chapter and verse in the SQL spec > where it says that information_schema should hide temp tables of > other backends. That change seems pretty dubious to me. (More > likely, we should be adding tests on whether

Re: [PATCHES] Information_schema fixes for sequences and temporary tables

2006-08-18 Thread Tom Lane
Greg Sabino Mullane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > More to come, but these two are probably worth backpatching. We can't really backpatch changes to information_schema, since we can't force initdb in back branches. I'd be interested to see you cite chapter and verse in the SQL spec where it says t