OK, patch backed out, new and regression file removed.
---
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Michael Fuhr wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 01:14:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Aside from minor problems like being
Michael Fuhr wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 01:14:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Aside from minor problems like being broken and undocumented, there is a
more serious question here: is this even the functionality we want?
I'd rather see something akin to PL/pgSQL's RETURN NEXT or PL/Pe
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 01:14:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Aside from minor problems like being broken and undocumented, there is a
> more serious question here: is this even the functionality we want?
I'd rather see something akin to PL/pgSQL's RETURN NEXT or PL/Perl's
return_next.
--
Micha
Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> This patch allows the PL/Python module to do (SRF) functions.
> Does this patch work?
Aside from minor problems like being broken and undocumented, there is a
more serious question here: is this even the functionality we want?
The proposed test case is
Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm running HEAD (8.1devel), which is where the patch was committed.
> Could somebody else test HEAD and see what they get?
Same as you --- ie, this patch is utterly broken.
> I don't see the setof functionality in the regression tests,
> presumably beca
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 04:23:42PM +0200, Gerrit van Dyk wrote:
>
> Ok, I just looked at the code again and the results I am getting, is
> what you expect.
>
> 2 rows every time returning 1 and 2.
>
> What version of postgres are you running, I am running 8.0.3
I'm running HEAD (8.1devel), whi
On Mon, Jul 04, 2005 at 03:04:51PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Patch applied. Thanks.
>
> Gerrit van Dyk wrote:
> >
> > This patch allows the PL/Python module to do (SRF) functions.
Does this patch work? The test_setof() function in sql/plpython_setof.sql
gives me the following:
SELECT *
Patch applied. Thanks.
---
Gerrit van Dyk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch allows the PL/Python module to do (SRF) functions.
>
> The patch was taken from the CVS version.
>
> I have modified the plpython.c file and have add
On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 03:03:46PM +0200, Gerrit van Dyk wrote:
>
> My next project I am working in is to get the PL/Python module to return
> records (ie. structured data)
Hmmm...if you're interested in working on PL/Python, then you might
mosey over to pgsql-hackers and see the "process crash