On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:21:07AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
[...]
The similar changes that remove the ability to recognize failures
during AbortTransaction are even worse, because cleanup after a failed
transaction is exactly where you would most expect software bugs to
pop up.
Hey, I was
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 06:16:59PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
After all this, I still think the TRANS state is unnecesary. I will add
checks in the low level routines so they see what TBLOCK state they are
called in, which should be enough to keep the current functionality
and robustness.
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 12:21:07AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch removes the unnecesary TRANS_* states that supposedly
represented low level transaction state. The state is actually
unnecesary because the states can be accurately represented
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This patch removes the unnecesary TRANS_* states that supposedly
represented low level transaction state. The state is actually
unnecesary because the states can be accurately represented using the
TBLOCK_* states.
Really?
Your changes to
