Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
> >Patch applied. Thanks.
> >
> >I have not backpatched it to 8.2.X because I am unclear of the risk
> >involved. Suggestions?
>
> It's bug in 8.2. I don't know about any risks for 8.2
OK, I have backpatched it to 8.2.X.
-
Patch applied. Thanks.
I have not backpatched it to 8.2.X because I am unclear of the risk
involved. Suggestions?
It's bug in 8.2. I don't know about any risks for 8.2
Pavel
---
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >"Pavel Steh
Patch applied. Thanks.
I have not backpatched it to 8.2.X because I am unclear of the risk
involved. Suggestions?
---
Pavel Stehule wrote:
> >"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > This patch correct bug, when
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
Pa
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch correct bug, when localized day or month names was incorectly
> trnasformed to lower or upper string.
I really dislike the API you've chosen for upper_str/lower_str ---
overwriting the input on the assumption that it's long enough is a
buff
"Pavel Stehule" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This patch correct bug, when localized day or month names was incorectly
> trnasformed to lower or upper string.
I really dislike the API you've chosen for upper_str/lower_str ---
overwriting the input on the assumption that it's long enough is a
buff
