Peter Eisentraut wrote:
If that doesn't create any new warnings on the current (fixed) code,
then I agree with this.
(Right, it does not.)
However, I'd like to see it factored more to
avoid repeating it for jade and nsgmls. The warning flags are in fact
SP flags, not Jade flags; only Jade is b
Neil Conway wrote:
> Attached is a crude patch to enable some additional jade/openjade
> warnings. This should help us catch improper or ill-advised SGML in
> the docs.
If that doesn't create any new warnings on the current (fixed) code,
then I agree with this. However, I'd like to see it factor
